<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is your brain really necessary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/</link>
	<description>My intuition just beat up your logic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:41:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhisiart Gwilym</title>
		<link>http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhisiart Gwilym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Siwmae Dan,

The story of the people with virtually no brains, who nevertheless lead normal lives and had often better than average IQs, first surfaced when I was living near Sheffield. I have no exact data now, but I seem to remember it was about forty years ago, and there was at least one TV documentary, and some comment in scientific and other journals. It&#039;s genuine, I think. It surfaced in the early days of MRI scans, when things were being seen that hadn&#039;t been possible before. As far as anything that I saw at the time goes, no-one made much of the obvious, glaring question: &quot;Well, if these people have such small amounts of brain tissue, how do they have such complete mental lives, and where is the source of their consciousness, if not these limited brains?&quot; Such questions were as taboo then to the materialist, reductive paradigm as the are now.

Cofion gorau, Rhisiart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siwmae Dan,</p>
<p>The story of the people with virtually no brains, who nevertheless lead normal lives and had often better than average IQs, first surfaced when I was living near Sheffield. I have no exact data now, but I seem to remember it was about forty years ago, and there was at least one TV documentary, and some comment in scientific and other journals. It&#8217;s genuine, I think. It surfaced in the early days of MRI scans, when things were being seen that hadn&#8217;t been possible before. As far as anything that I saw at the time goes, no-one made much of the obvious, glaring question: &#8220;Well, if these people have such small amounts of brain tissue, how do they have such complete mental lives, and where is the source of their consciousness, if not these limited brains?&#8221; Such questions were as taboo then to the materialist, reductive paradigm as the are now.</p>
<p>Cofion gorau, Rhisiart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I could have used this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.danbartlett.co.uk/writings/bob.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;when I summarised&lt;/a&gt; Bruce Lipton&#039;s book on epigenetics and how genes are incredibly overrated. Cells can survive without their nuclei, what is commonly perceived to be the brain of the cell.

I think the problem is in the definition of a brain. It tends to assume something, and then people look for something to fulfill the role they created! It&#039;s all backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I could have used this <a href="http://www.danbartlett.co.uk/writings/bob.php" rel="nofollow">when I summarised</a> Bruce Lipton&#8217;s book on epigenetics and how genes are incredibly overrated. Cells can survive without their nuclei, what is commonly perceived to be the brain of the cell.</p>
<p>I think the problem is in the definition of a brain. It tends to assume something, and then people look for something to fulfill the role they created! It&#8217;s all backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>All I can say is that your writing on consciousness doesn&#039;t make any sense at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is that your writing on consciousness doesn&#8217;t make any sense at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchformagic.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/is-your-brain-really-necessary/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hi my name is Timothy Tang. This is an invitation to view my theory on consciousness at my web site http://www.freewebs.com/consciousnessdecoded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi my name is Timothy Tang. This is an invitation to view my theory on consciousness at my web site <a href="http://www.freewebs.com/consciousnessdecoded" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewebs.com/consciousnessdecoded</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
